Leave the legal aspects of marriage to the state

One of the burning issues of the day is that of gay marriage.  No question the states can define “marriage” as whatever their constituents wish.  Man and donkey, woman and orangutan, or complimenting chairs.   I have no issue with that aspect of societies rights.  However, religions have serious issues.  “Marriage” as we have known it has been about inheritance rights, something that science has yet to bring about for same-sex or inter-species couples and all religious law is oriented that way.  No wonder it is splitting asunder churches, synagogues, mosques, and temples all over the nation.

May I offer a simple solution for your consideration?  Remove the ability of anyone except certain government clerks the right to legalize a marriage or civil union certificate.  This is the way it works in most of the rest of the world.  In Thailand, a devoutly Buddhist country, marriage takes place when you “sign the book” in front of a civil servant.  After that, the marriage is consecrated at the temple.  Nobody can prevent a couple from signing the book, and nobody can force a temple monk to consecrate the union.

Works for me…what do YOU think?


About malletteblog

If folks respond and push back, I will continue this blog. I do this to learn, not to teach. While I will defend my positions vigorously I will change them immediately upon evidence they are incorrect. This is how I learn, and I appreciate all efforts to help me not be a fool who learns only by experience.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s